Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #10674Re: read only /usr
From: Dinah Anderson
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 1989 14:22
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 1989 14:22
17 lines
1364 bytes
1364 bytes
We have opted to mount /usr rw. Many of our systems change on a daily
basis and we do not want to unmount (i.e. re-boot since mount now lives in
/usr/etc!) and re-mount /usr everytime we want to make a change to the
system. (install software, change kernels, etc.) It would be a nightmare.
Now we have the nightmare of worrying about a corrupted /usr. We are just
starting to migrate to 4.0 and we are making a lot of decisions on how we
think things work. Where possible, we are trying to use new 4.0 features
(like the automounter). It is not clear that the /usr mounted ro is a
feature we want to use.
I hope to see more discussion here about the pros and cons so that we can
make a more educated decision about this as we continue with our
migration.
Dinah Anderson
Shell Oil Company, Information Center (713) 795-3287
...!{sun,psuvax,soma,rice,ut-sally,ihnp4}!shell!dinah
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8901251629.AA16468@dogwood.IC.shell.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-requestShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request From: dinah@shell.UUCP (Dinah Anderson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Re: read only /usr Message-ID: <8901251629.AA16468@dogwood.IC.shell.com> Date: 1 Feb 89 14:22:30 GMT Sender: usenet@rice.edu Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 17 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu Original-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 89 10:29:36 CST X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 132, message 8 of 14