Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #11273Re: SUN-4 FPU
From: Marcel Bernards
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 1989 01:03
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 1989 01:03
18 lines
1116 bytes
1116 bytes
Bruce G. Barnett writes: >Maybe there is a communication problem, but Skip and I never said >the Sun 4/110 doesn't emulate the FPU. You are right: It was a communication problem. But is was on a late friday afternoon and my eyes were getting square by looking to long at my 1152 * 900 Monochrome pixels ;-) Sorry, my apologies...... >Does anyone have any ideas on how I can measure the number of traps I get >so I can estimate the penalty I pay? (I use NeWS a lot). ps, time, vmstat and pstat does not give appropriate information for kernel I also want a trap logger (like perfmeter), but I'm not a Kernel Guru :-( .signature
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8902220933.AA20842@ecn.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-requestShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request From: ecn!marcel@nluug.nl (Marcel Bernards) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Re: SUN-4 FPU Message-ID: <8902220933.AA20842@ecn.UUCP> Date: 4 Mar 89 01:03:50 GMT Sender: usenet@rice.edu Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 18 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu Original-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 89 10:33:06 +0100 X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 180, message 2 of 12