Re: SUN 386i bind() problem

Article View: comp.sys.sun

Article #11993

#11993

From: Craig Thomas
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1989 00:10

13 lines
1092 bytes

mrevox!rwu@bellcore.bellcore.com writes:
>Has anyone run into problems with the bind() call on the SUN 386i?

The trouble is the difference in byte order for your Sun386 host and the
network.  Check into the man page BYTEORDER(3N).  Change is needed for at
least this line:

>	name.sin_port = service->s_port;
should be:
	name.sin_port = htons(service->s_port);

 Craig Thomas 415-596-3646         {sun,lll-tis,pyramid,pacbell}!sybase!craigt
 Sybase, Inc., 6475 Christie Avenue, Emeryville, CA 94608    craigt@sybase.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3593@sybase.sybase.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request

References: <25900002@mrevox.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request
From: mtxinu!binky!craigt@ucbvax.berkeley.edu (Craig Thomas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re: SUN 386i bind() problem
Keywords: 386i
Message-ID: <3593@sybase.sybase.com>
Date: 21 Apr 89 00:10:57 GMT
References: <25900002@mrevox.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@rice.edu
Organization: Sybase, Inc.
Lines: 13
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
Original-Date: 31 Mar 89 05:58:51 GMT
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 232, message 6 of 21
X-Issue-Reference: v7n213

Reply to Parent Message