Re: Problems with SunOS 4.0.1, YP, and NFS mounting

Article View: comp.sys.sun

Article #12092

#12092

From: Dan Davison
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 1989 02:45

22 lines
1226 bytes

>> The portmapper with the checksum of 26206 16 may also work.

> What's the difference between this checksum and the one above?


A typo.  Originally the checksum of the portmapper that worked was 53902
24, and that's what I had written.  I then remembered that I changed it
for some reason and did the "sum" that I posted.  Use the 26206 16
version; I had a problem with the 53902 24 under some circumstances that I
can't recall now.


BTW, I only set the ifconfig lines in rc.boot.  Experimentation showed
that the setting in rc.local didn't always work.

dan davison
theoretical biology and biophysics
t-10 ms k710
los alamos national laboratory
los alamos, nm 87545 USA
dd@lanl.gov
505-665-1355

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8903311800.AA11747@benden>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request
From: dbd%benden@lanl.gov (Dan Davison)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re: Problems with SunOS 4.0.1, YP, and NFS mounting
Keywords: SunOS
Message-ID: <8903311800.AA11747@benden>
Date: 22 Apr 89 02:45:42 GMT
Sender: usenet@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 22
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
Original-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 89 11:00:17 MST
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 238, message 2 of 14