LaserWriter baud follow-up

Article View: comp.sys.sun

Article #12168

#12168

From: David Runyan
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1989 07:26

12 lines
1036 bytes

Thanks for the response to my LW II baud rate question.

General consensus was that Sun 3.5 will support 19200 but not 38400.  I
tried using 19200, and it seems to be working just fine.  As before, 38400
baud was no go.  Copies of the responses are available on request.

It's great to know there are so many people willing to share expertise.

        David Runyan
        EDS - Technical Systems Development
        runyan@eds.com
        UUCP: {uunet|sun|sharkey}!edsews!runyan

Technical Details

Message-ID: <12421@edsews.EDS.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request
From: runyan@eds.com (David Runyan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: LaserWriter baud follow-up
Keywords: Hardware
Message-ID: <12421@edsews.EDS.COM>
Date: 24 Apr 89 07:26:31 GMT
Sender: usenet@rice.edu
Organization: EDS/TSD - Troy, MI
Lines: 12
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
Original-Date: 6 Apr 89 12:48:48 GMT
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 242, message 11 of 16