Documentation packages, which is best?

Article View: comp.sys.sun

Article #12255

#12255

From: GC-AIS
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1989 00:47

11 lines
842 bytes

We're looking at buying some workstations to run a documentation
package, such as Framemaker or Interleaf.  Have any of you
substantially used both of those, and have an opinion on their relative
merits?  Is DEC's Compound Document Architecture decent?

Thanks,

Hans
Hans Reiser
email: reiser@ARDEC.ARPA
voice: (201) 724-5436

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8904041011.aa17992@ARDEC-CC1.ARDEC.ARPA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request
From: reiser@pica.army.mil (GC-AIS)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Documentation packages, which is best?
Keywords: Software
Message-ID: <8904041011.aa17992@ARDEC-CC1.ARDEC.ARPA>
Date: 26 Apr 89 00:47:00 GMT
Sender: usenet@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 11
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
Original-Date: Tue, 4 Apr 89 10:11:15 EST
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 249, message 10 of 20