🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #12475

Re: mixing 3.3 and 4.X within a local net

#12475
From: mr
Date: Fri, 05 May 1989 11:15
22 lines
1636 bytes
Can't claim specific knowledge of mixing 3.3 with 4.X, but certainly claim
claim 3.2 mith 4.0.1 - it works fine. We still have over half our machines
running 3.2 (to support existing products). The 3.2 and 4.0.1 run separate
YP domains (messy, but rather unavoidable - we need to stick fairly
closely to vanilla Sun distributions). We have a wide range of models on
this net (Sun-2 and up). This includes 386i, but we did ditch SNAP and
just run them as part of the main 4.0.1 domain.

All systems are happily cross-mounting NFS file systems. The only pain is
remembering which "universe" you are currently logged in to. Most painful
between 386i and non-386i - need to use different .defaults, etc.  to get
best benefits (ask for copies of my .login if interested). Even as I
write, I note that the 386i diskless in front of me is served by a 3/280,
all on the one net.

        Martin Reed, Racal Imaging Systems Ltd

uucp: mr@ritd.co.uk, uunet!ukc!ritd!mr, sunuk!ritd!mr     
Global String: +44 256 469943   Fax: +44 256 471492       
Paper: Rankine Road, Basingstoke, Hants, England, RG24 0NW

#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <24695.8904230930@skye.ritd.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request
From: mr@racal-itd.co.uk
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re: mixing 3.3 and 4.X within a local net
Keywords: Networks
Message-ID: <24695.8904230930@skye.ritd.co.uk>
Date: 5 May 89 11:15:45 GMT
Sender: usenet@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 22
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
Original-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 89 10:30:08 BST
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 267, message 3 of 10