Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #12747Re: END of file test in F77 under SUN OS 4
From: Lars Andersson
Date: Thu, 11 May 1989 02:26
Date: Thu, 11 May 1989 02:26
22 lines
1454 bytes
1454 bytes
In article <891@draken.nada.kth.se> larsa@nada.kth.se (Lars Andersson) writes: >X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 269, message 10 of 23 > >The typescript included below exhibits an example of what I personally >consider to be nonstandard f77 behaviour. I would call it a bug, but this >is so simple and basic stuff that I can't see how it could leak through >even the most elementary test. [example program deleted] Well, after talking to the SUN support people, I got a tape containing no less than six separate bugfixes, one of which covered the previously mentioned one. It seems to me that news about bugfixes etc should be distributed by software companies (such as SUN) to license holders, _without_ users having to prompt the support people for this. I would like to know whether this is standard practice. Lars Andersson larsa@nada.kth.se
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<970@draken.nada.kth.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-requestReferences:
<891@draken.nada.kth.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request From: larsa@spirit.nada.kth.se (Lars Andersson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Re: END of file test in F77 under SUN OS 4 Keywords: Software Message-ID: <970@draken.nada.kth.se> Date: 11 May 89 02:26:00 GMT References: <891@draken.nada.kth.se> Sender: usenet@rice.edu Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Lines: 22 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu Original-Date: 7 May 89 12:15:31 GMT X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 281, message 1 of 19