Re: PC-NFS 2.0 vs. SunOS 4.0.1

Article View: comp.sys.sun

Article #12802

#12802

From: Brett Chapman x5156
Date: Thu, 11 May 1989 13:35

11 lines
833 bytes

I was told by someone (I can't remember who!) that one should use PC-NF
3.0 in conjunction with 4.0.x.  I can't say if this is really the cause of
your problems or not.

I hope this helps!

	Brett Chapman
	G.E. Medical Systems
	(414) 548-5156
	uunet!{steinmetz,crdgw1}!gemed!chapmanB
	sun!sunbrew!gemed!chapmanB

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8905041545.AA15494@gemed.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request
From: gemed!blc@crdgw1.ge.com (Brett Chapman  x5156  )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re: PC-NFS 2.0 vs. SunOS 4.0.1
Keywords: Networks
Message-ID: <8905041545.AA15494@gemed.com>
Date: 11 May 89 13:35:47 GMT
Sender: usenet@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 11
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
Original-Date: Thu, 4 May 89 10:45:53 CDT
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 284, message 5 of 13