Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #1291partitions (bad idea ??)
From: Root Boy Jim
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1989 15:04
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1989 15:04
24 lines
1541 bytes
1541 bytes
? From: Chris Torek <chris@mimsy.umd.edu> ? eho@cognito.princeton.edu (Eric Ho) asks: ? >The only reason that I can see to have the notion of partitions around ? >from the OS standpoint is to limit filesystem size (& to make a filesystem) ? >and maybe easier for doing backups. ? The main reason for partitions is to limit file system size (adminstrators ? may have their own reasons for doing this; the kernel does not care, so ? long as the FS sizes fit in the 32 bit numbers the kernel uses) and/or to ? create separate file systems on a single physical medium. Well, yes, this is a very good reason for the existence of partitions. Of course, there are others. For example, an application (or group of them) which uses large amounts of space can be fenced in by partitions. However, my favorite use of them is as read-only space. Take all your distribution tapes, sources, etc., put them in a RO partition, and make symlinks links elsewhere to them. They are now uncorruptible, even by root. They are also quick to access; no updating atimes. Root Boy Jim Have GNU, Will Travel.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1110@brazos.Rice.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!iuvax!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-requestShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!iuvax!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request From: rbj@dsys.ncsl.nist.gov (Root Boy Jim) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: partitions (bad idea ??) Keywords: SunOS Message-ID: <1110@brazos.Rice.edu> Date: 21 Aug 89 15:04:39 GMT Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 24 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 8, Issue 107, message 15 of 16