Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #13152Sun f77
From: Peter J. Welcher
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 1989 19:57
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 1989 19:57
15 lines
1032 bytes
1032 bytes
Pardon me if this has already been covered.
A user has been benchmarking f77 with various fpa options on a Sun 3/280.
He took a simple REAL benchmark, changed some types to COMPLEX and DOUBLE
COMPLEX types , and noted a slowdown by a factor of about 90. The obvious
assumption is that the COMPLEX library code doesn't use the FPA.
I haven't looked deeply into this (i.e. I scanned TFM but didn't note
anything relevant). (I'm not that interested in Fortran.)
For the f77 hackers:
Am I missing something ?
Should this occur ?
Is this a known bug ?
Is there anything I can do about it ?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3772@brazos.Rice.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!sun-spots-requestShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!sun-spots-request From: pjw@usna.navy.mil (Peter J. Welcher) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Sun f77 Keywords: Software Message-ID: <3772@brazos.Rice.edu> Date: 5 Dec 89 19:57:19 GMT Sender: root@rice.edu Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 15 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 8, Issue 216, message 12 of 16