Re: AARRGGHH X11/NeWS AARRGGHH

Article View: comp.sys.sun

Article #13263

#13263

From: Eric Wines
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1989 12:34

21 lines
1476 bytes

In article <3406@brazos.Rice.edu> canon!smith@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk (Mark Smith) writes:
>X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 8, Issue 209, message 2 of 14
>
>I can't stand it. Back in the summer, we saw the X11/NeWS Beta release

You're not the only one who can't stand it!


>running at Sun here in the UK. It looked to be ready Real-Soon-Now. At the
>time, we understood that FCS was expected sometime in September. Here it
>is, the end of November, and we keep hearing how it's delayed here, it's
>on hold in the U.S., etc. etc. Meanwhile, messages show up on the net
>which suggest some people actually have it in their hands. Does anyone
>know what's really happening? I'll take semi-substantiated rumours at this
>point.

The package is slow.  It's also quite buggy, and quite disapointing.  I am
only commenting the X11 side, as that's what we mainly use.  Big, blatant
bugs, bugs that make the machine unuseable. Did they test this?

fozzy@caen.engin.umich.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3929@brazos.Rice.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!aplcen!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!rice!sun-spots-request

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!aplcen!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!rice!sun-spots-request
From: fozzy@maize.engin.umich.edu (Eric Wines)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re: AARRGGHH X11/NeWS AARRGGHH
Keywords: Software
Message-ID: <3929@brazos.Rice.edu>
Date: 12 Dec 89 12:34:00 GMT
Sender: root@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 21
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
X-Refs:  Original: v8n209
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 8, Issue 225, message 2 of 16