4.0 format vs. stand/diag

Article View: comp.sys.sun

Article #13895

#13895

From: apex!larrys
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1990 17:06

10 lines
955 bytes

Is there any information on the relative merits of the OS resident 4.0
format and the standalone disk diag programs?  I have found some practical
differences, for example, that diag will format and surface analyze
faster, and that diag will come up when you're in a hurry.  Fortunately,
on a Sun-3, you can copy diag and other standalone programs into a
directory called /stand on the 4.0 system and still use diag when you are
in a hurry.

So are there any real technical advantages to format over diag -- or are
all the advantages in diag?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5187@brazos.Rice.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!sun-spots-request

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!sun-spots-request
From: apex!larrys@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: 4.0 format vs. stand/diag
Keywords: Software
Message-ID: <5187@brazos.Rice.edu>
Date: 21 Feb 90 17:06:56 GMT
Sender: news@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 10
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 9, Issue 47, message 17