🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #13976

Re: 4.0 format vs. stand/diag

#13976
From: dupuy
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1990 21:00
15 lines
1282 bytes
With all this format-bashing I feel I have to say something in its
defense.  While it may be inconvenient to load MUNIX just to run format, I
almost never do this myself.  It's much easier to boot a machine diskless,
with a GENERIC kernel, and run format from that, with all the conveniences
of Unix for saving and loading defect lists, etc.  It's also very nice not
to have to run single-user (i.e. unavailable) overnight when formatting a
disk and running surface analysis.

It would be nice if format were a bit more robust, and for those poor
folks without servers to boot from, it might be convenient to combine the
MUNIX and miniroot stages, so that suninstall could be run from MUNIX, or
at least add dump and restore to the set of MUNIX utilities.

inet: dupuy@cs.columbia.edu
uucp: ...!rutgers!cs.columbia.edu!dupuy
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5309@brazos.Rice.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!sun-spots-request

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!sun-spots-request
From: dupuy@cs.columbia.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re: 4.0 format vs. stand/diag
Keywords: SunOS
Message-ID: <5309@brazos.Rice.edu>
Date: 26 Feb 90 21:00:20 GMT
Sender: root@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 15
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
X-Refs:  Original: v9n47, Replies: v9n53
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 9, Issue 53, message 9