🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #14116

Re: So what about those 4-Mb SIMMs?

#14116
From: Francis Vaughan
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 1990 06:09
22 lines
1644 bytes
From article <5443@brazos.Rice.edu>, by lindy!romeo@lindy.stanford.edu (Patrick Goebel):
> Judging by recent postings on this bboard, 4-Mb SIMMs are available and
> come relatively cheap (i.e. approx. $500/chip or $125/Mb).  Does this mean
> I can simply replace the 8 X 1-Mb SIMMs on a SPARCstation 330 CPU board
> (for example) with 8 X 4-Mb ones?

Not a problem. We currently have one 4/310 (That is a 4/110 with a 330 CPU
card in it) with 8x4MB SIMMs in it running now.

The memory we have is from Kingston Technology, part number
KTM-4000/9-80s.  Not too hard to work out what that means. There is no
height problem with these, they are exacly the same height as the SIMMs we
took out.  There is NO need for a ROM change. There is a single jumper
next to the memory on the board that needs closing with one of those
little configuration jumpers.

Over here in OZ memory is a little more expensive, but we judged it now
worthwhile to stock the machines full now.  It seems that SUN are trying a
bit of the old FUD factor marketing.

                                        Francis Vaughan
                                        francis@cs.ua.oz.au
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5536@brazos.Rice.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!sun-spots-request

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!sun-spots-request
From: francis@chook.ua.oz.au (Francis Vaughan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re: So what about those 4-Mb SIMMs?
Keywords: Hardware
Message-ID: <5536@brazos.Rice.edu>
Date: 5 Mar 90 06:09:32 GMT
Sender: root@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 22
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
X-Refs:  Original: v9n69, Replies: v9n71
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 9, Issue 71, message 9