Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #1572Solbourne
From: Tim Richardson
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1989 06:58
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1989 06:58
23 lines
1507 bytes
1507 bytes
=In article <1637@brazos.Rice.edu> you write:
=X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 8, Issue 131, message 10 of 11
=
=Some potential compatibility problems with Solbourne (and, I presume,
=other vendors to come) are that they don't quite offer a complete SunOS (a
=
=P.S. We don't have a Solbourne. I'd be interested in hearing directly
=from people who do. Most requests to this list for Solbourne experiences
=seem to go unanswered.
Not only does Solbourne not have a completely compatible software release
with 100% of Sun software, they aren't even hardware compatible. Their
implementation of the VMEbus leaves the Rev C1 published spec., writhing
in agony. I mean like who ever heard of not being able to address in A32
space??? or having to drive the upper 8 address bits to zero (remember
that the backplane terminators drive them to a logic 1 if not driven by
the current bus master) even if you want to talk in A24 space?
'Course thats not all, but it should give you an idea.
Tim Richardson
| ames!vsi1!tim tim@vicom.com
Vicom Systems Inc.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1667@brazos.Rice.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-requestShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request From: tim@vicom.com (Tim Richardson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Solbourne Message-ID: <1667@brazos.Rice.edu> Date: 25 Sep 89 06:58:07 GMT Sender: root@rice.edu Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 23 Keywords: Hardware Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 8, Issue 133, message 8 of 9