Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #1700Message queues
From: Raghu
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1989 16:46
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1989 16:46
30 lines
1747 bytes
1747 bytes
Two questions about message queues in SunOS:
1. I have a problem withe following piece of code. I am trying to use the
message queue facility in UNIX and I have come across a strange problem.
The constant KERNEL_PORT is 2401 and the getuid call returns 104 ( my uid
on our SUNS at OSC). Then, with a key of 2505 the call msgget blow out
with the message "Permission Denied". That should not happen as I set the
msgflag to reflect that (0000600). Has anyone else seen this problem or
aware of this problem...
/* if ((myqid = msgget((key_t) (KERNEL_PORT + getuid()), IPC_CREAT|0000600)) */
if ((myqid = msgget((key_t) getuid(),IPC_CREAT|0000600))
== ERROR) {
perror("kernel (msgget)");
exit(errno);
}
2. I am exploring the use of message queues instead of the traditional
socket IPC operations. The application involves a daemon-like program to
rendezvous two other processes and I want to use the message queue
facility to make synchronization possible. I am interesting in evaluating
on how much faster it would be to go this way. Gut feeling indicates that
message queues could be faster than passing UDP packets around and this
might be because the UNIX kernel supports this facility better ( and
probably uses it) .
Any ideas or comments !!
Raghu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1846@brazos.Rice.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!rutgers!ucsd!ucbvax!husc6!rice!sun-spots-requestShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!rutgers!ucsd!ucbvax!husc6!rice!sun-spots-request From: raghu@timbaktu.osc.edu (Raghu) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Message queues Keywords: SunOS Message-ID: <1846@brazos.Rice.edu> Date: 29 Sep 89 16:46:44 GMT Sender: root@rice.edu Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 30 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 8, Issue 148, message 6 of 10