Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #6347Re: Sun's IPC vs Sparc speed (does it need memory?)
From: Mark Holden
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 1991 05:38
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 1991 05:38
12 lines
1272 bytes
1272 bytes
In article <1069@brchh104.bnr.ca> john@triton.jpl.nasa.gov writes: >We have an IPC (16 MIPS, 8 megs, OS 4.1.1) on a net with three Sparc 1's >(11 MIPS, 12 megs, OS 4.1.0). We have noticed that the subjective speed of >the IPC is below the Sparc's (OpenWindows seems sluggish). Do we need more >memory? Could there be any other speedup solutions? Definately memory. OpenWindows munches that 8M immediately. If you expand the machine to 16M, it should do much better. Our 8M SLC's don't run OW nearly as well as our 16M SLC's. Considering the price of memory (non Sun of course) tthere's little reason to not expand the machine. Plus, doesn't Sun only claim 12 Mips for the SLC? (12.8, or some such?)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1086@brchh104.bnr.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!brtph3!brchh104!brchs1!bnr.ca!rice.edu!sun-spots-requestShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!brtph3!brchh104!brchs1!bnr.ca!rice.edu!sun-spots-request From: holdenm@stolaf.edu (Mark Holden) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Re: Sun's IPC vs Sparc speed (does it need memory?) Keywords: Hardware Message-ID: <1086@brchh104.bnr.ca> Date: 6 Jan 91 05:38:24 GMT Sender: news@brchh104.bnr.ca Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 12 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu X-Refs: Original: v10n9 X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 9, message 5 X-Note: Submissions: sun-spots@rice.edu, Admin: sun-spots-request@rice.edu