Sun 4/4x0 vs. Auspex

Article View: comp.sys.sun

Article #6666

#6666

From: Alan Medsker
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 1991 17:11

16 lines
1288 bytes

Does anyone out there have any words of wisdom for me regarding the merits
of using a Sun 4/470 or 4/490 vs. an Auspex NS3000 for NFS service?  I've
probably got 80 clients on SPARC 1 or better workstations, and many of
them would possibly hit the machine at once, some heavily, so I'm looking
for as much performance as I can afford.

Specifically, it would be good to hear how others made such a decision,
and if there are any compatibility issues here (i.e. it's a Sun 3
processor, but does it always run Sun 3 binarys?).  Thanks in advance for
any thoughts you might have.

Please email responses to amedsker@Viewlogic.COM.  I'll summarize if
anyone's interested.

Alan Medsker                                 Viewlogic Systems, Inc.
Internet: amedsker@Viewlogic.COM

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1414@brchh104.bnr.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!brtph3!brchh104!brchs1!bnr.ca!rice.edu!sun-spots-request

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!brtph3!brchh104!brchs1!bnr.ca!rice.edu!sun-spots-request
From: alan@viewlogic.com (Alan Medsker)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Sun 4/4x0 vs. Auspex
Keywords: Hardware
Message-ID: <1414@brchh104.bnr.ca>
Date: 23 Jan 91 17:11:32 GMT
Sender: news@brchh104.bnr.ca
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 16
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 28, message 8
X-Note: Submissions: sun-spots@rice.edu, Admin: sun-spots-request@rice.edu