Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #68724/490 vs 4/390 vs Auspex as a server?
From: brad
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 1991 19:22
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 1991 19:22
17 lines
1263 bytes
1263 bytes
We are looking into upgrading our server capacity. We currently have a
Sun 4/280 and a Sun 4/390 serving ~40 Sparcatation {SLC,IPC,1,1+,2},
4/110, and Sun 3 workstations. We are starting to see problems with this
as far as load on the servers and response time to the clients, and the
in-flow of workstations continues.
Does anyone have real experience with the differences between any of the
three options listed (4/490, 4/390, Auspex) as far as providing NFS and
compute service. The big questions being do you get significant gains
going from a 390 to a 490, and how does the Auspex fit into a real-world
environment.
Thanks in advance,
Brad Smith
CIS Board, UC Santa Cruz
brad@cis.ucsc.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1688@brchh104.bnr.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!brtph3!brchh104!brchs1!bnr.ca!rice.edu!sun-spots-requestShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!brtph3!brchh104!brchs1!bnr.ca!rice.edu!sun-spots-request From: brad@spica.ucsc.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: 4/490 vs 4/390 vs Auspex as a server? Keywords: Hardware Message-ID: <1688@brchh104.bnr.ca> Date: 19 Feb 91 19:22:00 GMT Sender: news@brchh104.bnr.ca Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 17 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu X-Original-Date: 13 Feb 91 00:37:47 GMT X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 38, message 16 X-Note: Submissions: sun-spots@rice.edu, Admin: sun-spots-request@rice.edu