Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #6996Any reviews of Sun S-Bus Terminal Boards (request #2)...
From: Gray Watson
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1991 17:28
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1991 17:28
16 lines
1059 bytes
1059 bytes
We are *very* unhappy with our 3rd party S-Bus terminal board and are
looking at Sun's as a replacement.
However, I have yet to hear of anyone having one and I am a little be wary
about switching unless I know the destination state is going to be an
improvement.
If you are using Sun's terminal boards:
Question:
* how is it in general?
* how's the buffering?
* are all the modem lines supported?
Thanks very much,
gray
gray%antr.uucp.@med.pitt.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1944@brchh104.bnr.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!brtph3!brchh104!brchs1!bnr.ca!rice.edu!sun-spots-requestShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!brtph3!brchh104!brchs1!bnr.ca!rice.edu!sun-spots-request From: cgwst@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Gray Watson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Any reviews of Sun S-Bus Terminal Boards (request #2)... Keywords: Hardware Message-ID: <1944@brchh104.bnr.ca> Date: 18 Mar 91 17:28:00 GMT Sender: news@brchh104.bnr.ca Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 16 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu X-Original-Date: 6 Mar 91 05:56:07 GMT X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 56, message 2 X-Note: Submissions: sun-spots@rice.edu, Admin: sun-spots-request@rice.edu