Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #8006performance NeWS vs. X11R4
From: John Stephens
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 1991 18:40
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 1991 18:40
25 lines
1623 bytes
1623 bytes
A number of our users have been complaining of declining performance
of there 12 MB 4.1.1 SparcStations while running openlook. Looking
at comparative perfmeters versus my machine with a generic R4
installation and mwm1.1, I can see very little difference *except*
on the openlook machines, it appears that the xnews process is
taking up an inordinate amount of the ram/cpu. From a typical ps
(edited to fit the page):
%CPU %MEM SZ RSS START TIME COMMAND
0.0 25.3 3184 2716 16:38 264:01 xnews :0 -auth $HOME/.xnews.$HOST:0
0.0 0.0 40 0 16:38 0:00 xinit - - xnews :0 -auth /net/grizzly/tool2
This is after the machine has been up just under 24 hours. Why is xnews
soaking up 250+ cpu minutes (more than 10 minutes per hour !) and 25%
of the ram ?!!!
Thanks for shedding light on the darkness,
Jack
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Jack Stephens ..!{uunet|pyramid}!infmx!jms --or-- ..!jack!wzlr!jms |
| Systems Programmer "Into the valley of Death rode the 600... |
| Informix Software which allowed them to use the carpool lane." |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3115@brchh104.bnr.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!brchh104!brchs1!bnr.ca!rice.edu!sun-spots-requestShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!brchh104!brchs1!bnr.ca!rice.edu!sun-spots-request From: infmx!jms@uunet.uu.net (John Stephens) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: performance NeWS vs. X11R4 Keywords: No Digest Subjects in Unmoderated Mode Message-ID: <3115@brchh104.bnr.ca> Date: 4 Jun 91 18:40:00 GMT Sender: news@brchh104.bnr.ca Organization: Sunspots, Psuedo-Unmoderated Lines: 26 Approved: sun-spots@rice.edu X-Original-Date: Fri, 10 May 91 23:29:55 GMT