Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #9193Reliability of Sun 3/50's?
From: De Clarke x2630
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1988 19:32
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1988 19:32
14 lines
1299 bytes
1299 bytes
Organization: UCO/Lick Observatory, UCSC, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA The question before us, as we contemplate acquisition of our sixth and seventh Sun 3/50-ME-4, is 'to maintain or not to maintain?'. Has anyone out there had conclusive experience of the failure rate of 3/50's in a normal office environment (no a/c, isolation-txformer-type power conditioning)? Needless to say Sun's next-day maintenance is rather costly and we will forgo it if the marketplace says that 3/50's are super-reliable. Actually, a mass survey of the reliability of various Sun products might be in order, I'm sure I'm not the only one who's interested! voice: 408-429-2630 fax: 408-429-2730 email: root@helios.ucsc.edu root@portal.bitnet
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8811102030.AA03003@helios>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!hplabs!ucbvax!pasteur!ames!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-requestShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!hplabs!ucbvax!pasteur!ames!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request From: root@helios.ucsc.edu (De Clarke x2630) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Reliability of Sun 3/50's? Message-ID: <8811102030.AA03003@helios> Date: 22 Nov 88 19:32:28 GMT Sender: usenet@rice.edu Reply-To: Sun-Spots@Rice.edu Organization: Rice University, Houston, Texas Lines: 14 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu Original-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 88 12:30:31 PST X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 21, message 10 of 12