Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #9472Re: Poor 800-number response
From: Dr. A.Bykat
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 1988 17:31
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 1988 17:31
11 lines
1065 bytes
1065 bytes
("Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@silvlis.com>) :
>With all of the horror stories about time to get a response from the 800
>number going around, I thought I should relate a success...
For us, the hardware service response was very good right from the word go
(Sept 88). However, the software 800 service was and is atrocious. No
response after two weeks, next day response after a call to the service
supervisor, followed by dead silence for the next couple of weeks. Then a
fifteen minute of activity, followed by "we don't care silence till now!!!
And, to add an insult to an injury, the only response that we've got was
incorrect!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8812150432.AA03375@rice.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rice!sun-spots-requestShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rice!sun-spots-request From: BYKAT@UTCVM.BITNET (Dr. A.Bykat) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Re: Poor 800-number response Message-ID: <8812150432.AA03375@rice.edu> Date: 21 Dec 88 17:31:03 GMT Sender: usenet@rice.edu Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 11 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu Original-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 88 23:22:15 EST X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 70, message 2 of 14