🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #9472

Re: Poor 800-number response

#9472
From: Dr. A.Bykat
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 1988 17:31
11 lines
1065 bytes
("Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@silvlis.com>) :
>With all of the horror stories about time to get a response from the 800
>number going around, I thought I should relate a success...

For us, the hardware service response was very good right from the word go
(Sept 88). However, the software 800 service was and is atrocious.  No
response after two weeks, next day response after a call to the service
supervisor, followed by dead silence for the next couple of weeks. Then a
fifteen minute of activity, followed by "we don't care silence till now!!!
And, to add an insult to an injury, the only response that we've got was
incorrect!
Technical Details
Message-ID: <8812150432.AA03375@rice.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rice!sun-spots-request

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rice!sun-spots-request
From: BYKAT@UTCVM.BITNET (Dr. A.Bykat)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re: Poor 800-number response
Message-ID: <8812150432.AA03375@rice.edu>
Date: 21 Dec 88 17:31:03 GMT
Sender: usenet@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 11
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
Original-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 88 23:22:15 EST
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 70, message 2 of 14