Article View: comp.sys.sun
Article #9761Re: SUG SEX: a quiet moment afterwards
From: Bob Sutterfield
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 1988 04:46
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 1988 04:46
20 lines
1391 bytes
1391 bytes
chuck@trantor.harris-atd.com (Chuck Musciano) writes: >Well, I'm already looking at SUG-SEX '89, and would like some >feedback from '88 participants. > >Should we do it again? Yes! by all means. >What would make it better? Wonderful as it was for the nice folks to provide you with a machine with a shoebox and a tape drive on the spur of the moment, the resources simply weren't adequate to the demand. It needs more concurrent tapetools, more tape drives, and more disk space. In other words, several machines sharing NFS with each other. What a remarkable idea for Sun users! The SEX machine should be attached to the rest of the floor network. Perhaps vendors in booths would provide tape drives on their demo machines. You could walk up with a tape and while it's grinding, they would have you captive to listen to a sales talk :-)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8812121604.AA01724@allosaur.cis.ohio-state.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-requestShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request From: bob@cis.ohio-state.edu (Bob Sutterfield) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Re: SUG SEX: a quiet moment afterwards Message-ID: <8812121604.AA01724@allosaur.cis.ohio-state.edu> Date: 20 Dec 88 04:46:14 GMT Sender: usenet@rice.edu Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 20 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu Original-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 88 11:04:18 EST X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 63, message 1 of 11