minfree for large file systems

Article View: comp.sys.sun

Article #9834

#9834

From: mcvax!ritd.co.uk!mr
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 1988 05:06

14 lines
1095 bytes

I am pondering whether the "minfree" default of 10% makes sense with the
very large file systems that we are beginning to see (1Gb+).  OK, so disk
is cheaper per megabyte than ever it was, but are we wasting
bucks/pounds/francs/ningies/etc. needlessly?

Would anyone who understands the finer intricacies of the BSD file system
like to comment or suggest, please. Would 5% start to make more sense? Am
I talking alone in my wonder?

        Martin Reed, Racal Imaging Systems Ltd

uucp: mr@ritd.co.uk,uunet!ukc!ritd!mr,sunuk!brains!mr
Global String: +44 252 622144
Paper: 309 Fleet Road, Fleet, Hants, England, GU13 8BU

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2560.8812131150@iona.ritd.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rice!sun-spots-request

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rice!sun-spots-request
From: mcvax!ritd.co.uk!mr@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: minfree for large file systems
Message-ID: <2560.8812131150@iona.ritd.co.uk>
Date: 21 Dec 88 05:06:31 GMT
Sender: usenet@rice.edu
Organization: Ardent Computer Corp., Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 14
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
Original-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 88 11:50:32 GMT
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 67, message 13 of 20