Re: SMD Vs SCSI: Results of Survey

Article View: comp.sys.sun

Article #9888

#9888

From: Anthony A. Datri
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1988 21:39

7 lines
855 bytes

maxlin!wbc@dartvax.dartmouth.edu writes:
>We have a3/160 with 3 3/50(60) clients, OS 3.4.  long ago we decided to go
>to SMD despite the extra expense for the following reason: The scsi bus
>seems to be able to talk to one device at a time.

As I remember, Sun didn't implement disconnect/reconnect on the scsi bus,
but I thought this was fixed in 3.4.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8812152156.AA05597@stepstone.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rice!sun-spots-request

References: <11286@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rice!sun-spots-request
From: hsi!stpstn!aad@uunet.uu.net (Anthony A. Datri)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re: SMD Vs SCSI: Results of Survey
Message-ID: <8812152156.AA05597@stepstone.com>
Date: 22 Dec 88 21:39:34 GMT
References: <11286@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>
Sender: usenet@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 7
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
Original-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 88 16:56:59 EST
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 74, message 16 of 16

Reply to Parent Message