Re: Solbourne and Sun Compatibility

Thread View: comp.sys.sun

1 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

1 total messages Started by James R. Seamans Thu, 27 Jun 1991 20:22

#8661

Author: James R. Seamans
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1991 20:22

32 lines
1681 bytes

In article <3808@brchh104.bnr.ca> qmrward@uqvax.cc.uq.oz.au writes:
>Are there any reliability or compatibility problems with Solbourne systems
>in comparison to Suns ??
>
>Please post replies.
>
>Chris Ward
>QIMR
>Brisbane  AUSTRALIA
>E-mail QMRWARD@UQVAX.CC.UQ.EDU.AU

We currently have three Solbourne S4000 systems ( one week old ) running
in a heavy Sun envirnoment.  If you ignore that they are still using
OS 4.0.3, the systems slid into the network without a hitch.  This
was in all aspects, NIS, printers, NFS the works.  We are expecting
OS 4.1 by the end of June which will aleivate some software incompatibility
problems in the libraries.

=============================================================
Jim Seamans        seamans@nlm.nih.gov
High Resolution Medical Imaging Group (HRMIG)
National Library of Medicine - National Institutes of Health
Bldg 38A RM 712
8600 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD   20894
(voice) 301 496-4441   (fax) 301 402-0118
--
=============================================================
Jim Seamans        seamans@nlm.nih.gov
High Resolution Medical Imaging Group (HRMIG)
National Library of Medicine - National Institutes of Health

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads