Article View: comp.sys.ti.explorer
Article #140PDL
From: Victor Raskin
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1989 05:06
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1989 05:06
7 lines
863 bytes
863 bytes
While running some recursive, but fairly simple, functions on our Explorer 4.1 we have repeatedly run into PDL overflow problems. We have had to raise the PDL up to 20 times before we could successfully run our functions. We are planning to raise the PDL in order to avoid having to rely on the machine doing so. Has anybody run into the same kind of problems? Are there any risks involved in changing the PDL? Are there limits (inherent or practically recommendable)?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8911280506.AA10739@ee.ecn.purdue.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!EE.ECN.PURDUE.EDU!raskinShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!EE.ECN.PURDUE.EDU!raskin From: raskin@EE.ECN.PURDUE.EDU (Victor Raskin) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ti.explorer Subject: PDL Message-ID: <8911280506.AA10739@ee.ecn.purdue.edu> Date: 28 Nov 89 05:06:22 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: inet Organization: The Internet Lines: 7