Article View: comp.sys.transputer
Article #1148Re: Any info on T425 - T414 compatibility ?
From: Luigi Rizzo
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 1990 16:13
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 1990 16:13
53 lines
2756 bytes
2756 bytes
I received the following answer that I've been asked to post. BTW,
other people answered (many thanks to all of them), and I'll post a
summary in a few days (still waiting fore some answers).
=================================================================
From chris@inmos-c.inmos.com Fri Nov 30 09:56:52 1990
Received: from uunet.UU.NET by uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu (5.61/1.34)
id AA27827; Fri, 30 Nov 90 09:56:49 -0600
Received: from inmos-c.inmos.com by uunet.UU.NET (5.61/1.14) with UUCP
id AA12701; Fri, 30 Nov 90 10:53:57 -0500
From: Chris Larsen <chris@inmos.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 90 08:52:45 MST
Message-Id: <4999.9011301552@inmos-c.inmos.com>
To: rizzo@uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: Any info on T425 - T414 compatibility ?
Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer
In-Reply-To: <1990Nov27.174407.19573@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Organization: INMOS Corporation, Colorado Springs
Cc:
Status: R
In article <1990Nov27.174407.19573@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> you write:
>Does anyone has information about the compatibility between the T414
>and the T425 ?
This can be gotten from your local Regional Technology Center.
A quick run down on the differences is that a T425 has 4KB of
internal RAM, T800 style links, 2D block move support and (as a
consequence of the 2D block move support) a different value for
MemStart.
> We have have bought a couple of T425 to replace the
>T414B, but they are not even seen by the Worm program supplied with
>the TDS (D700D). The program correctly recognizes a T800 or a T414
>plugged in the same socket. Where is then the problem ? Hardware or
>software incompatibility ?
You can get a newer and better worm with source code from our mail
archive server. The email address is archive-server@inmos.COM. By
the way, we're having some problems getting news articles out on the
net; if you would be so kind, please post the information in this
message for me. Thanks.
>Also, did anyone out there try the T400 ? Are there similar problems
>of compatibility as the ones we experimented ? Any suggestion or
>similar experience is welcome.
Ditto.
--
Chris Larsen
chris@inmos.COM
Inmos US Central Applications
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Nov30.161353.2101@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rutgers!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu!rizzoReferences:
<1990Nov27.174407.19573@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rutgers!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu!rizzo From: rizzo@uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu (Luigi Rizzo) Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer Subject: Re: Any info on T425 - T414 compatibility ? Keywords: T425, T414 Message-ID: <1990Nov30.161353.2101@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: 30 Nov 90 16:13:53 GMT References: <1990Nov27.174407.19573@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Sender: news@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News) Distribution: comp Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Lines: 53