Article View: comp.sys.transputer
Article #1227Re: WoTUG T9000 Systems Workshop Summary
From: D.J.Beckett
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 08:53
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 08:53
23 lines
1420 bytes
1420 bytes
In article <1992Oct15.124810.4050@hubcap.clemson.edu> clsi!!kevin@uunet.UU.NET writes: > >In article <1874@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>, djb1@ukc.ac.uk (David Beckett) writes: >> >> The first day began with an overview of what the T9000 offered, > ^^^^^^^ > >Is this "will" offer, or have they actually managed to build something in >silicon? The silicon that we were shown was the T9000 alpha, with _only_ the VCP missing. The VCP/virtual channels already work and the tester for that was produced months ago. The photo mask of the processor dye for the T9000 beta was shown: this had the VCP present and at the current time, the silicon for this has been available for a few weeks now and is in testing. [All this information is correct, I hope. INMOS people - what do you say?] Dave Beckett
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1895@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!gatech!hubcap!fpstReferences:
<1874@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> <1992Oct15.124810.4050@hubcap.clemson.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer,comp.parallel Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!gatech!hubcap!fpst From: djb1@ukc.ac.uk (D.J.Beckett) Subject: Re: WoTUG T9000 Systems Workshop Summary Message-ID: <1895@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> Sender: fpst@hubcap.clemson.edu (Steve Stevenson) Reply-To: djb1@ukc.ac.uk (David Beckett) Organization: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK. References: <1874@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> <1992Oct15.124810.4050@hubcap.clemson.edu> Date: 16 Oct 92 08:53:23 GMT Approved: parallel@hubcap.clemson.edu Lines: 24