Article View: comp.sys.transputer
Article #1231Re: T9000 Availability (one of our VCPs in missing)
From: Mark Homewood
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 10:23
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 10:23
23 lines
1430 bytes
1430 bytes
In aarticle (*1992Sep25.150100.25582@inmos.co.uk) davidb@inmos.co.uk (Dave `ham) writes: > Read the posting ! He said that the beta lacks a VCP. Beta Si is _defined_ > as something which _has_ a VCP so the statement was wrong. > Christ knows what Dave gave to Partytec. It wasn't 1--3 or 5 or 7 though. I did indeed read the posting, and correctly. The message I reported spoke of T9000 beta silicon, as did the second poster, who sounded like he was there. It might have been clearer of you to point out that this fact was not true rather than, WRONG ! Your reply does throw some light on the status of the T9000 for the many people that have mailed/posted on this subject. > The part given to Parsytec Gmbh was either a > Duff T9000 alpha without VCP or T9000 mechanical sample. (Edited) Fred ------------- A man so stupid he had to have wisdom teeth grafted on.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep28.102324.19345@meiko.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!news.Brown.EDU!noc.near.net!meiko.com!fredReferences:
<1992Sep24.161650.8220@inmos.co.uk> <1992Sep25.124814.20302@meiko.com> <1992Sep25.150100.25582@inmos.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!news.Brown.EDU!noc.near.net!meiko.com!fred From: fred@meiko.co.uk (Mark Homewood) Subject: Re: T9000 Availability (one of our VCPs in missing) Message-ID: <1992Sep28.102324.19345@meiko.com> Sender: news@meiko.com Organization: Meiko Ltd. Bristol, outer spirals of ERM References: <1992Sep24.161650.8220@inmos.co.uk> <1992Sep25.124814.20302@meiko.com> <1992Sep25.150100.25582@inmos.co.uk> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 10:23:24 GMT Lines: 23