Article View: comp.sys.transputer
Article #1270re: RE: Transputer Simulator for Sun
From: Stephen Doyle
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 10:26
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 10:26
43 lines
2697 bytes
2697 bytes
in Article 87 of comp.sys.transputer: jan@ceres.neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (Jan Vorbrueggen) writes > ... a significant porting effort to the gcc compiler for the DEC > station (and all those other MIPSbased machines from MIPS, SGI, ...) would be > required? Porting effort IS significant, we do not throw sources at a compiler and ship the result, we do something called testing and this means that customers can rely upon the resulting product. Porting also does not necessarily mean rewriting code (which is written in ANSI C) but it does necessitate working out the difference in functionality between implementations of standard functions. It is not sufficient to port the simulator, the whole toolset would need to be ported. We have learnt to trust gcc, we have had some bad experiences with DEC libraries and Posix support. > And don't tell me about quality, manuals etc Plainly quality is not an issue to you, it is to INMOS. > > ... proliferation of a technology is not done by > > Universities but through volume design ins at major OEMs. > Quite right, but how are these decisions made? Volume design ins are made due to confidence that the right tools exist to do the job, that timescales can be met, that the technology to use is the corporate standard and even sometimes that the technology provides what is needed. Decisions are made by managers (sometimes not technical) and buyers, not engineers fresh out of University. > Why do you think DEC had a 10%oflistprice policy for software for uni > versities, and now has the CSLG? DEC sells big expensive machines to Universities on which to run its big expensive software. If you were to spend an equivalent amount on INMOS products you could probably negotiate similar reductions on software. INMOS is predominantly a silicon vendor and matches pricing, discounts and functionality of silicon competitors such as Intel and Motorola. We are not in the workstation market and should not be compared to HP, DEC, IBM or Sun. Steve Steve Doyle, Software Marketing, INMOS Ltd | Tel +44 454 616616 1000 Aztec West | Almondsbury | UK: steved@inmos.co.uk Bristol BS12 4SQ, UK | US: steved@inmos.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct6.102636.3139@titan.inmos.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!inmos!titan.inmos.co.uk!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!inmos!titan.inmos.co.uk!news From: steved@lion.inmos.co.uk (Stephen Doyle) Subject: re: RE: Transputer Simulator for Sun Message-ID: <1992Oct6.102636.3139@titan.inmos.co.uk> Sender: news@titan.inmos.co.uk Reply-To: steved@inmos.co.uk () Organization: INMOS Limited, Bristol, UK. Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 10:26:36 GMT Lines: 43