Re: Transputer vs. i860

Article View: comp.sys.transputer

Article #156

Back to comp.sys.transputer Previous Next

#156

From: Peter Siemon
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 1989 12:02

10 lines
1110 bytes

What Craig Davidson is perfectly o.k. But his conclusion is wrong.
Obviously INTEL is the better company, has the better product, the better
marketing, the better service and the better support. I cannot argue about
the bad things he said about INMOS as we have a different distributor here.
But things seem to be very similar at this end of the world: prices and
support, availability and documentation - mail me for my personal remarks
(or better not).

So - if INMOS looses. I do not care. The idea of parallel processing has
not been invented by them. And it might be perfected by someone else!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1488@laura.UUCP>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!mcvax!unido!laura!exunido!siemon

References: <8907150609.AA01452@sdsu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!mcvax!unido!laura!exunido!siemon
From: siemon@exunido.uucp (Peter Siemon)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer
Subject: Re: Transputer vs. i860
Message-ID: <1488@laura.UUCP>
Date: 21 Jul 89 12:02:12 GMT
References: <8907150609.AA01452@sdsu.edu>
Sender: news@laura.UUCP
Reply-To: siemon@exunido.UUCP (Peter Siemon)
Distribution: comp.sys.transputer
Organization: University of Dortmund, W-Germany
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message