Article View: comp.sys.transputer
Article #1614Re: Dynamic reconfiguration
From: Piet van Oostrum
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1991 15:29
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1991 15:29
14 lines
1399 bytes
1399 bytes
We have a 16 transputer system and one C004 link switch. As the C004 has only 32 in/outputs, the other 32 links must be put into a fixed configuration. Any suggestion about what would be a good one? We want to be able to make the usual networks: grid, ring, torus, tree, 4d cube etc. Anyway much less than 32! different ones. We don't find it very useful to have more than one connection between two transputers, or to connect a transputer to itself. The numbering of the links is also not important. And all connections just bidirectional. -- Piet* van Oostrum, Dept of Computer Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 14, P.O. Box 80.089, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands. Telephone: +31 30 531806 Uucp: uunet!mcsun!ruuinf!piet Telefax: +31 30 513791 Internet: piet@cs.ruu.nl (*`Pete')
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Apr24.152955.8378@cs.ruu.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!alchemy!pietReferences:
<13869.9104191421@inmos-c.inmos.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!alchemy!piet From: piet@cs.ruu.nl (Piet van Oostrum) Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer Subject: Re: Dynamic reconfiguration Message-ID: <1991Apr24.152955.8378@cs.ruu.nl> Date: 24 Apr 91 15:29:55 GMT References: <13869.9104191421@inmos-c.inmos.com> Sender: piet@cs.ruu.nl (Piet van Oostrum) Reply-To: piet@cs.ruu.nl (Piet van Oostrum) Organization: Dept of Computer Science, Utrecht University, The Netherlands Lines: 14 In-Reply-To: andyr@inmos.com (Andy Rabagliati)