Article View: comp.sys.transputer
Article #1737GCC, Mach, Linux: Summary of interest/activity
From: David B. Teague
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:34
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:34
126 lines
5389 bytes
5389 bytes
I have collected all of the mail and postings I assembled from people either interested in or doing work on various forms of free transputer software. I would like to hear more about all of these topics, so if this should spark more discussion, I would appreciate being cc:ed. [[[ Please respond to bray@wcuvax1.wcu.edu, NOT dbt@adm... Thanks.]]] Happy Hacking, --Jim From: Alessandro.Forin@ERNST.MACH.CS.CMU.EDU Subject: RE: Mach on transputers? Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT I think it is a great idea. As far back as two years ago I have encouraged the Grenoble folks to look into this, esp given the support that chip was getting in Europe. I do not know if they have followed my advice or not. It does seem that the still-not-ready T900 (?) will not win that big over say alpha-based machines. But as you point out there are other interesting properties in that chip. The lack of an MMU is, on the other hand, pure brain damage. sandro- From: michael@robots.oxford.ac.uk (Michael Stevens) Subject: Mach on Transputers? Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Jim, If you do get any info about people doing Mach3 on a transputer, I would also be interested. I would be quite happy to help out if someone is working on such a project. Michael Stevens, Robotics Research Group,Dept of Engineering Science,Oxford,UK INTERNET: michael@robots.oxford.ac.uk From: dlb@osf.org Subject: RE: Mach on transputers? Cc: mach3@cs.cmu.edu Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > Has anyone given thought to running Mach3 on transputers? While I To some extent. The big drawback is that the current parts (T800 series) have neither virtual memory nor protection of any sort. The next series of parts (T9000) will have physical segmentation with segment based protection. The OSF Research Institute is working on a modified prototype of Mach which should work on such an architecture (segmentation, but no page based virtual to physical memory mapping). There are currently no plans to port this to transputers, but if someone wants to volunteer ... --Dave Subject: [u31b3hs@cip-s01.informatik.rwth-aachen.de: Code for accessing a transputer link under Linux 0.96a available per ftp] I got too much requests, so now you can get my first work from ftp.thp.uni-koeln.de, path pub/linux/transputer, file sirius.tar.Z. It contains a user-space link driver (hopefully) inmos specs compliant, source code for a small link test program, a transputer binary and a transputer disassembler. If you have iserver, you should be able to link it with my driver. I don't make any warranties, releasing that stuff is to reduce my e-mail. Feel free to suggest improvements, bugfixes. *This release does not contain the assembler/linker.* Future releases will follow :) Michael [[[ I never was able to reach his machine because of network timeouts. -jb ]]] From: in%"mwe@isy.liu.se" Date: 1-SEP-1992 13:47:22.63 To: BRAY CC: Subject: RE: Good C++ or C Compilers? reply I am currently working on a port of gcc/g++ to the transputer. The current status is that I have a working as/ld and a gcc that generates something that does compile and load, but does not work. The time I can spend on the project is rather limited, so I dont know when it will be finished. If you want to look at what I have I can make it available to you at our ftp-site. Mikael Wedlin Phone: +46-13282707 Dept of Electrical Engineering Internet: mwe@isy.liu.se [[[ I have not heard from Mikael in a long time. I hope I hear more about this if it progresses. --jb ]]] From: gkt@iitmax.iit.edu (George Thiruvathukal) Subject: Transputers and Linux Organization: Illinois Institute of Technology / Academic Computing Center Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 15:51:00 GMT Is anybody out there using Linux to develop transputer software? If so, please send me information about what you are doing and what tools you are using to get it done. For some time, I have been interested in porting gcc as a cross compiler for the Inmos transputer family. Since I use T805-based boards from Computer System Architects, my inclination is to cross compile to the T805. The T805 supports fixed and floating point and is a RISC processor. As these transputer boards do not directly support I/O, an I/O server must be written to perform I/O on the host processor, e.g. a PC running Linux. If there is anybody out there interested in the possibility to work on a free Linux-based toolset for transputers, or if someone is doing it already, please let me know. I will post a summary on this subject. Hopefully, there will be some responses to warrant a summary. -- George K. Thiruvathukal IIT - School of Computer Science - gkt@iitmax.iit.edu Tellabs - Data Communications Division - att!tellab5!gkt
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov20.193423.10731@ncsu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rock!taco!adm.csc.ncsu.edu!dbtShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rock!taco!adm.csc.ncsu.edu!dbt From: dbt@adm.csc.ncsu.edu (David B. Teague) Subject: GCC, Mach, Linux: Summary of interest/activity Message-ID: <1992Nov20.193423.10731@ncsu.edu> Followup-To: bray@wcuvax1.wcu.edu Sender: bray@wcuvax1.wcu.edu (Jim Bray) Organization: wcuvax1.wcu.edu (CS Dept., Western Carolina University) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:34:23 GMT Lines: 127