Re: REQ: T9000 Status

Article View: comp.sys.transputer

Article #1778

Back to comp.sys.transputer Previous Next

#1778

From: Fred U. Rosenberger
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 14:51

11 lines
880 bytes

Seems the T9000 is too late to be very useful.
WHAT IS STATUS OF THE GENERATION AFTER THE T9000?
Almost ready?  4 or 5 years away?  Never?
I have not heard anything about this except for some very preliminary
discussion by David May at a WOTUG conference.

Seems that the decision to invest time/effort/dollars in using the
T9000 depends to a major extent on what follows (and when).


Fred

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec12.145151.1877@wuecl.wustl.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!wupost!eclnews!wuee1!fred

References: <3999@news.cerf.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!wupost!eclnews!wuee1!fred
From: fred@wuee1.wustl.edu (Fred U. Rosenberger)
Subject: Re: REQ: T9000 Status
Message-ID: <1992Dec12.145151.1877@wuecl.wustl.edu>
Sender: usenet@wuecl.wustl.edu (News Administrator)
Nntp-Posting-Host: wuee1
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis Mo.
References: <3999@news.cerf.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 14:51:51 GMT
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message