Article View: comp.sys.transputer
Article #1957Re: transputer evaluation board (with T800)
From: Nick Rothwell
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1987 13:36
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1987 13:36
24 lines
1545 bytes
1545 bytes
In article <580001@otter.HP.COM> writes:
>>Hi
> The only info I have is the Inmos compiler is available
>in a Beta release version at #750, this price includes upgrades. From
>speaking to Inmos they are not too impressed by the compiler.
I wouldn't listen too closely to what Inmos say about compilers. They're
chief complaint, I gather, is that the C compiler doesn't go as fast as
OCCAM. Pretty self-evident, since the t/puter is an OCCAM engine. I also
heard (but *don't quote me*, please) that Inmos received a beta version of
the C compiler, for internal testing, and, since Inmos don't much care
about languages other than OCCAM (i.e. about "alien" languages), they just
shrugged their shoulders and put it on the market.
Disclaimer: These are opinions based on second-hand accounts. *I* believe every
word, but make up your own minds...
--
Nick Rothwell, Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science, Edinburgh.
nick%lfcs.ed.ac.uk@nss.cs.ucl.ac.uk
<Atlantic Ocean>!mcvax!ukc!lfcs!nick
~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
"Nothing's forgotten. Nothing is ever forgotten." - Herne
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<854@its63b.ed.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!ukc!its63b!csnjrReferences:
<580001@otter.HP.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!ukc!its63b!csnjr From: csnjr@its63b.ed.ac.uk (Nick Rothwell) Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer Subject: Re: transputer evaluation board (with T800) Message-ID: <854@its63b.ed.ac.uk> Date: 18 Dec 87 13:36:04 GMT References: <580001@otter.HP.COM> Reply-To: nick@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (Nick Rothwell) Organization: LFCS, University of Edinburgh Lines: 24