🚀 go-pugleaf

>From scubed!tcgould!transputer-request  Sun Jul 10 17:42:17 1988 remote from ames
Received: Sun, 10 Jul 88 17:42:17 PDT by ames.arc.nasa.gov (5.59/1.2)
Received: from s3sun (s3sun.ARPA) by scubed (1.2/5.20a)
	id AA22520; Sun, 10 Jul 88 17:42:50 pdt
Received: by s3sun (5.51/5.20b)
	id AA29238; Sun, 10 Jul 88 17:41:54 PDT
Received: from TCGOULD.TN.CORNELL.EDU by seismo.CSS.GOV (5.59/1.14) 
	id AA16442; Sun, 10 Jul 88 20:40:08 EDT
Received: by tcgould.TN.CORNELL.EDU (5.54/1.2-Cornell-Theory-Center)
	id AA00120; Sun, 10 Jul 88 20:04:50 EDT
Received: by tcgould.TN.CORNELL.EDU (5.54/1.2-Cornell-Theory-Center)
	id AA29996; Sun, 10 Jul 88 20:04:29 EDT
Received: from prg.oxford.ac.uk by NSS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK   via Janet with NIFTP
           id aa03925; 10 Jul 88 18:16 BST
Received: by uk.ac.ox.prg (4.12/prgv.28)
	id AA20222; Sun, 10 Jul 88 18:35:54 bst
Sender: ames!scubed!prg!transputer-request
Received: from edinburgh.phyvax by uk.ac.ox.prg (4.12/prgv.28)
	id AA20045; Sun, 10 Jul 88 17:37:05 bst
Message-Id: <8807101637.AA20045@uk.ac.ox.prg>
Date: 		10-JUL-1988 17:37:09 GMT +01:00
>From: ames!scubed!phyvax!JHOH
To: transputer@prg.oxford.ac.uk
Subject: 	Communication between Transputer and other Microprocessors

 Several questions.
 1. Which is the best way to get a fast communication bandwidth
  between transputer and other microprocessors, say 68020 or 80386, etc.?
  It seems that there was two approach, say dual ported RAM approach
  and serial link adaptor to parallel bus. Is there any better way?
  Other communcation chip(say Intel's) will be helpful? 
  Why serial link adaptor is so slow as we see from Meiko board or
  serial link of Niche board? Can't we get better performance 
  c011 or c012?

 2. Does anybody have an experience of ethernet interface of Transputer?
  I was told Meiko and Telmat have. Any comment anout their product?

 Jong-Hoon Oh
 jhoh@uk.ac.ed.phyvax