Parsytec (Once More)

Article View: comp.sys.transputer

Article #2338

Back to comp.sys.transputer Previous Next

#2338

From: Patrick Van Renterghem / Transpu...
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 1988 18:23

13 lines
1167 bytes

I received no decent answers to my "Parsytec incompatibility questions".
Just to remind you, my first question was about the library format and
what Inmos exactly changed (e.g. headers). The second question was about
the debugger, but takes larger proportions than that. As Parsytec does not
use the same reset scheme and no analyse at all, the debugger, 3L Parallel
C compiler, ... can not reset/analyse the transputers in a network of
Parsytec boards. Are we condemned to wait for a new release from Parsytec,
or is there a solution. If you have one, would you be so kind to let me know?
 
Has anyone good/bad experiences with Microway Quadputer/T800 ?
 
Patrick (pvr @ bgerug51 on bitnet)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8811290921.AA26938@uk.ac.ox.prg>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!NSS.CS.UCL.AC.UK!PVR%bgerug51.earn

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!NSS.CS.UCL.AC.UK!PVR%bgerug51.earn
From: PVR%bgerug51.earn@NSS.CS.UCL.AC.UK (Patrick Van Renterghem / Transputer Lab)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer
Subject: Parsytec (Once More)
Keywords: >     B-9710 Ghent-Zwijnaarde, Belgium, Europe. Fax: +32 91 22 85 9
Message-ID: <8811290921.AA26938@uk.ac.ox.prg>
Date: 28 Nov 88 18:23:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 13