Article View: comp.sys.transputer
Article #398Transputer Link Analyser Follow-up
From: David Laurenson
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1989 16:38
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1989 16:38
50 lines
2793 bytes
2793 bytes
About a week ago I sent a message asking for help, namely...
>I am trying to build a transputer link analyser that passively
>monitors the communications link between two transputers, and produces
>a high level (hopefully) form of debugging/performance monitoring.
>I am currently trying to find a suitable differential driver/receiver
>pair that I can use that will not introduce more than 3nS skew.
I have received a number of replies, some of which were very helpful.
I obviously did not make it clear what I was intending to do. I am
going to use a C011 link adaptor to read in the link data, it is the
electrical interface that I am worried about. I have had a number of
suggestions about suitable chips:-
Erik Johansson of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory replies:-
>Our links are buffered between boards using 74LS240s (or 74LS540s).
>You could equally well use 74LS244s or 74LS541s. We use a 100 ohm
>series resistor to provide impedance matching on the sending side, and
>the signal is carried by a twisted pair wire with one side tied to
>ground. On the receiving end, we use a 100k ohm pull-up resistor to
>keep unconnected links idle (it is a pull-up because our logic is
>inverted between boards). Although this scheme is not differential,
>we have not had any problems with noise, and have driven the links at
>both 10 and 20 MHz.
David Boreham of inMoS replies:-
>Try National Semiconductor parts DS8921A, DS8922A, DS8923A.
>The best parts known are made by AT&T but are not generally
>available. We have in-house link monitors and will be
>bringing out a commrecial one in the next few months.
And finally from Lyle Bingham of Computer Systems Architects,
>You might investigate use of the National Semiconductor 26F31 and 26F32
>devices. AMD makes a workable set of differential buffers that we
>have used for years. These are the 26LS31 and 26LS32.
>If you can handle the speed, the optimum for skew is probably the
>26C31/32 pair from National. Also of note is the National DS 8921 AN
>differential driver/receiver pair.
Thanks for all your help, and any further suggestions can be mailed to
me at my address below.
Dave.
David I. Laurenson |
Department of Computer Science |
Edinburgh University King's Bldgs | JANET dil@uk.ac.ed.lfcs
Mayfield Road, EDINBURGH U.K. |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1111@castle.ed.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!sobmips!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!lfcs!dilShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!sobmips!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!lfcs!dil From: dil@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (David Laurenson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer Subject: Transputer Link Analyser Follow-up Message-ID: <1111@castle.ed.ac.uk> Date: 16 Nov 89 16:38:31 GMT Reply-To: dil@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (David Laurenson) Organization: Laboratory for the Foundations of Computer Science, Edinburgh U Lines: 50