Article View: comp.sys.transputer
Article #613T9000 Delay?
From: STALKER
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 20:15
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 20:15
16 lines
1122 bytes
1122 bytes
Dear Netters: A few days ago, James K. Prater commented on an unexpected delay for the release of the INMOS T9000 chip. Does anybody has any additional comments or learned about this delay from a different source? We are interested to know the fate of the T9000 if it ever hits the market. I also would like to know why this forum of information/disputes/commentaries has been kept so quietly lately. Has the general interest on the transputer dropped so dramatically that nobody cares to put any lines here? So we use this forum to comment on other parallel architectures or related research? Think about it... Mario Stalker SYSCON CORPORATION stalker@capsrv.jhuapl.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9208121919.AA24678@theory.TC.CORNELL.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!ucbvax!CAPSRV.JHUAPL.EDU!STALKERShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!ucbvax!CAPSRV.JHUAPL.EDU!STALKER From: STALKER@CAPSRV.JHUAPL.EDU Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer Subject: T9000 Delay? Message-ID: <9208121919.AA24678@theory.TC.CORNELL.EDU> Date: 12 Aug 92 20:15:00 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: world Organization: The Internet Lines: 17