Re: Transputer benchmarks?

Article View: comp.sys.transputer

Article #772

Back to comp.sys.transputer Previous Next

#772

From: Len Moskowitz
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 1990 14:36

10 lines
1008 bytes

I'd be happy to hear of any reasonable yeardstick with which I could
compare them.  If anyone has run a task on these machines using
commonly used compilers and without substantial optimization, I'd
appreciate hearing the relative performance results.

If I had to boil my question down it'd go like this:

"Can a single transputer (any model) run my typical C application
significantly (say four or more times) faster than my 20
megaHertz 68030?"

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Jul.17.10.36.27.1990.5723@paul.rutgers.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!paul.rutgers.edu!moskowit

References: <Jul.16.15.20.45.1990.13411@paul.rutgers.edu> <1990Jul17.060710.890@specialix.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!paul.rutgers.edu!moskowit
From: moskowit@paul.rutgers.edu (Len Moskowitz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer
Subject: Re: Transputer benchmarks?
Keywords: T4xx and T8xx relative to 680x0, 88x00, i860/i960
Message-ID: <Jul.17.10.36.27.1990.5723@paul.rutgers.edu>
Date: 17 Jul 90 14:36:28 GMT
References: <Jul.16.15.20.45.1990.13411@paul.rutgers.edu> <1990Jul17.060710.890@specialix.co.uk>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message