Re : Transputer ProcClockOut

Article View: comp.sys.transputer

Article #816

Back to comp.sys.transputer Previous Next

#816

From: David Boreham
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 1990 07:40

23 lines
1338 bytes

In article <1049@undeed.UUCP> mwebster@undeed.uucp (Mitchell R Webster) writes:
>
>Does anybody know the specified phase relationship between the 5 MHz input
>clock to the transputer and its ProcClockOut ? Perhaps a friendly IMOS
>employee or two could respond.  This information doesn't appear in the data
>sheets.  Please reply to email address or fax/mail diagrams, drawings etc to


Easy answer: 


There isn't one.
Not that's worth looking for anyway.

If you want to, mail me describing what you are
thinking of doing and I'll see if there is another
way, such as putting the device in PLL disable mode.

David.

David Boreham, INMOS Limited | mail(uk): davidb@inmos.co.uk or ukc!inmos!davidb
Bristol,  England            |     (us): uunet!inmos.com!davidb
+44 454 616616 ex 547        | Internet: davidb@inmos.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8795@ganymede.inmos.co.uk>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!mcsun!ukc!inmos!brac!davidb

References: <1049@undeed.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!mcsun!ukc!inmos!brac!davidb
From: davidb@brac.inmos.co.uk (David Boreham)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer
Subject: Re : Transputer ProcClockOut
Message-ID: <8795@ganymede.inmos.co.uk>
Date: 26 Jul 90 07:40:22 GMT
References: <1049@undeed.UUCP>
Sender: news@inmos.co.uk
Reply-To: davidb@inmos.co.uk (David Boreham)
Organization: none
Lines: 23

Reply to Parent Message