🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.sys.transputer
2 messages
2 total messages Started by Paul Smith Wed, 02 Jan 1991 23:55
ANSI C Toolset
#1298
Author: Paul Smith
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 1991 23:55
25 lines
1599 bytes
	Pardon me if this has been discussed previously, I haven't been 
reading this group for a while.

	I just received some information in the mail from INMOS about 
a new product, "ANSI C Toolset for the Transputer Family" and I would 
like to find out if anyone is or has used this.  Specifically I'd 
like to know more about the debugger which is touted in the glossy.  
They supposedly provide both an interactive and post-mortem source 
level debugger, as well as a simulator.  I would like to know how 
well the interactive debugger works.  Particularly how well it 
deals with multiple processes on a single transputer, and accessing 
local or static variables.  

	We currently are using Logical Systems C and have written our 
own post-mortem debugger, based on adb.  We're using the B011 board 
on a sun 3.  We very happy with the code LS's compiler generates
but we'd be happy with an interactive debugger.


-- 
*************************************************************************
    Paul Smith                                  paul@crl.ucsd.edu
    Center for Research in Language             pssmith@ucsd.bitnet
    University of California at San Diego       (619) 534-2695
Re: ANSI C Toolset
#1301
Author: Ian Nandhra
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 1991 13:16
38 lines
2019 bytes
paul@crl.ucsd.edu (Paul Smith) writes:


>	I just received some information in the mail from INMOS about 
>a new product, "ANSI C Toolset for the Transputer Family" and I would 
>like to find out if anyone is or has used this.  Specifically I'd 
>like to know more about the debugger which is touted in the glossy.  
>They supposedly provide both an interactive and post-mortem source 
>level debugger, as well as a simulator.  I would like to know how 
>well the interactive debugger works.  Particularly how well it 
>deals with multiple processes on a single transputer, and accessing 
>local or static variables.  

>	We currently are using Logical Systems C and have written our 
>own post-mortem debugger, based on adb.  We're using the B011 board 
>on a sun 3.  We very happy with the code LS's compiler generates
>but we'd be happy with an interactive debugger.

I have been using the Inmos C compiler for a long time now (almost
from the start) targetting T2 family Tp's.

The debugger has more features than I have time to go into,
it has proved to be extremly useful, well thought out and well
worth using. 

Gripes? Well there are a few, but nothing anywhere is 
perfect and frankly we would be starting to nit-pick.

Unfortunately I have no experience with it on multiple transputer
networks. However, from the menu's its looking good.... :-)

Gotta rush......


-- 
Ian Nandhra,     iann@specialix.co.uk     {backbone}!mcsun!ukc!slxsys!iann
I am speaking, but  | If these are your opinions, then we are in agreement!!
not for my employer.| Flames, spelling errors, complaints > /dev/null
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads