Thread View: comp.sys.transputer
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Ian East
Fri, 14 Aug 1992 08:44
occam
Author: Ian East
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 08:44
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 08:44
29 lines
1823 bytes
1823 bytes
If there's a wall around I'll bang my head against it. With luck enough others might bang this one. Yer never know it might fall down. occam is not dead. It is in widespread use throughout the transputer development community by those who are willing to try it out and listen to its arguments. Why is occam so good? The potted version: security, explicit concurrency, readability and run-time modularity via processes. (It is easy to think and reason about a system as a network of processes at run-time. These are easily expressed and read in occam.) Security is not easy to achieve in a concurrent system. occam makes it a hell of a lot easier. Besides, is it so unreasonable to use a parallel programming language to do parallel programming. I have seen code written in C for transputers which has been recoded in occam. I know which I would rather read and trust! My message is simply this. TRY IT! It is the easiest language I've ever learned and by far and away the most rewarding to use. occam 3 will provide source-code modularity too, which just about picks up all the requirements of a modern programming language. All we need now is compilers for a range of targets (especially Macs, Suns as used in teaching establishments so as to broaden the expertise base). These appear at last to be on their way now that Inmos have released source for their compiler, Ian East ian%buck@uk.ac.ukNet University of Buckingham
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads