Re: What's a "CTOS"

Article View: comp.sys.unisys

Article #10

#10

From: Dick Zeitlin
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1992 11:50

14 lines
1049 bytes

  > .>Agreed, but I'd class it as real-time.  Task switching time is quite
  > .>predictable.  Task prioritization is easy and precise.  What OS would
  > .>you consider more suited for real-time?

GO> .  mm! Heard about iRMX from INTEL?

Yes, and also RT-11 from DEC.  (And there have been a couple of
weak tries at adding RT extensions to *ix systems...)  Both good OS' for
real-time. But what makes them more suited for real-time?

        D/

 * OLX 2.2 * Bring back A-N airways!!    Dick.Zeitlin%acc1bbs@ssr.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <130.166.uupcb@ssr.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hotmomma!acc1bbs!dick.zeitlin

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hotmomma!acc1bbs!dick.zeitlin
From: dick.zeitlin%acc1bbs@ssr.com (Dick Zeitlin) 
Newsgroups: comp.sys.unisys
Subject: Re: What's a "CTOS"
Message-ID: <130.166.uupcb@ssr.com>
Date: 1 Nov 92 11:50:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Advanced Computer Concepts BBS, New Rochelle, NY 914-654-1981
Reply-To: dick.zeitlin%acc1bbs@ssr.com (Dick Zeitlin) 
Lines: 14