🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.unisys
Article #290

Re: Boycott on Unisys still effective

#290
From: Lee Sau Dan ~{
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 1995 11:51
27 lines
2415 bytes
Michael I Bushnell (mib@churchy.gnu.ai.mit.edu) wrote:
>> You are incorrect.  There are two types of patents: method patents and
>> object patents.  Software patents are all method patents, which apply
>> to the person who uses the method.  The software developer might be
>> contributing to infringment (and a user themselves) but the user is
>> also an infringer.

I'm not living in US; nor am I a legal expert.  However, the above is
also true in HK.

>> The difference depends on whether it is a method or object patents.
>> In the case of car building, any method patents are used only by the
>> factor, not the car owner.  This is thus different from software,
>> where the user is a user of the method.

Now, what if I write a program which, when fed with the same input
data, will produce the same output as the LZW algorithm?

A method patent only prevents others from using that method, but
never prevents others from obtaining the same product using a
sufficiently different method!  So, if my program, say, do it
using some magic mathematical formulae rather than the code-table
lookup in the LZW algorithm, it should not be infringing, should it?

Then, my opinion is that a method patent is highly implementation
dependent!  So, using a different implementation generating the same
output will not be an infringing act.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <D2G3Lt.BIn@hkuxb.hku.hk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!dearn!blekul11!idefix.CS.kuleuven.ac.be!ub4b!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk!hkuxb.hku.hk!h9210876
References: <MIB.95Jan11212125@churchy.gnu.ai.mit.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1056b0,bf0aced2f502dde0
X-Google-Attributes: gid1056b0,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e24f,bf0aced2f502dde0
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e24f,public
X-Google-Thread: ff68d,bf0aced2f502dde0
X-Google-Attributes: gidff68d,public
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,bf0aced2f502dde0
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-15 06:17:00 PST
Newsgroups: comp.sys.unisys,gnu.misc.discuss,alt.gif-agreement,alt.online-service.compuserve
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!dearn!blekul11!idefix.CS.kuleuven.ac.be!ub4b!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk!hkuxb.hku.hk!h9210876
From: h9210876@hkuxb.hku.hk (Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~})
Subject: Re: Boycott on Unisys still effective
Message-ID: <D2G3Lt.BIn@hkuxb.hku.hk>
Sender: usenet@hkuxb.hku.hk (USENET News System)
Nntp-Posting-Host: hkuxb.hku.hk
Organization: The University of Hong Kong
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
References: <MIB.95Jan11212125@churchy.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 1995 11:51:28 GMT
Lines: 31