Article View: comp.sys.unisys
Article #71Unisys not coming to CUBE in 1993
From: Edward Reid
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 16:27
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 16:27
43 lines
2831 bytes
2831 bytes
I just got the word that Unisys has announced they will not attend CUBE in Reno and New Orleans (the two 1993 CUBEs). They claim that they will only attend one user group, and they are going to attend USE. They also claim that attending two meetings costs them an extra $1 million per meeting. Now, I've only just heard the news, and a few details may be wrong. The outline is correct. None of this makes any sense, of course. First, the $1meg claim implies that Unisys has at least 200 employees who must attend _both_ conferences; this seems quite excessive given that virtually no technical staff attend both conferences. Second, Unisys has not cut back on obvious costs, such as the banquet, which is a nice warm fuzzy but totally unnecessary and not available to most user groups. Third, the groups will almost certainly be merged by 1994. The process is taking place now. Unisys does not need to add pressure to bring this about. Fourth, it is USE, not CUBE, that is being stubborn. CUBE has contractual commitments on the order of $450,000 in Reno, which realistically would probably mean about $150,000 to get out of the commitments, and has contractual commitments in New Orleans. CUBE already paid $85,000 to get out of Toronto as a result of Unisys' pressure for a joint conference. USE has no contractual commitments to Phoenix or Minneapolis (which is one reason their registration fees are much higher than CUBE's) yet refuses to consider moving. If CUBE moved to Phoenix, there are not enough meeting rooms downtown, and some sessions would be held a 35-minute bus ride away. Unisys has said they will not contribute a single penny to CUBE's moving expenses. Fifth, Ray Clovis, Unisys' liaison to CUBE, has a recommendation for CUBE. Just skip out on Reno without telling them. By the time the hotel gets around to suing, CUBE will have ceased to exist, having become part of the new organization. Hmm. If Unisys is recommending such actions to outsiders, what are they doing internally? Were last year's defense scandals just a fluke? I'm planning to write Unruh myself. I'll try to get a precise address, though I understand that PO Box 500, Blue Bell PA is sufficient. Edward Reid (8*}> eel: ed@titipu.meta.com or nosc.mil!titipu.meta.com!ed snail: PO Box 378/Greensboro FL 32330
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01010064.dcg9kh@titipu.meta.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!ucivax!news.service.uci.edu!unogate!mvb.saic.com!ncr-sd!blkhole!titipu!edShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!ucivax!news.service.uci.edu!unogate!mvb.saic.com!ncr-sd!blkhole!titipu!ed From: ed@titipu.meta.com (Edward Reid) Newsgroups: comp.sys.unisys Subject: Unisys not coming to CUBE in 1993 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 12:27:33 EDT(-0400) Organization: Accuracy, Ltd. Message-ID: <01010064.dcg9kh@titipu.meta.com> Reply-To: ed@titipu.meta.com (Edward Reid) X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v0 Lines: 43