Article View: comp.sys.workstations
Article #11Request for evaluations of Sun vs. DEC workstations
From: stone
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1987 06:04
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1987 06:04
10 lines
1107 bytes
1107 bytes
In addition to doing our own evaluation of Sun-3 vs. DEC VAXstation 2000 workstations, it would be nice if we could read the experiences of others. Did you buy Sun? and why? Or did you buy DEC? and why? Are you satisfied with your decision? Please share your impressions and experiences with us. Like olympic judges, we'll throw out the extreme high and low responses and average the rest in making our decision. Thanks very much. -- Anthony Stone NBC Computer Imaging, New York, NY ..!philabs!nbc1!stone 212-664-7832
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8711230604.AA21391@nbc1.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!nbc1!stoneShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!nbc1!stone From: stone@nbc1.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.workstations Subject: Request for evaluations of Sun vs. DEC workstations Message-ID: <8711230604.AA21391@nbc1.uucp> Date: Mon, 23-Nov-87 01:04:21 EST Article-I.D.: nbc1.8711230604.AA21391 Posted: Mon Nov 23 01:04:21 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 29-Nov-87 02:46:20 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 10 Approved: works@rutgers.edu